The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise looks before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on illegal sports betting.
No, they weren't personally in presence, however the world-famous stars were notably included in a slide presentation on social and sweepstakes gambling establishments - the questionable sites offering both totally free casino-style games and lucrative rewards, such as money, gift cards or cryptocurrency. In one advertisement, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anyone can 'play for complimentary,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.
The sites are just two cogs in the multibillion-dollar market that now finds itself besieged by lawsuits. In the eyes of lots of video gaming corporations, not to point out suit complainants and state regulators, sweepstakes gambling establishments serve as conventional casinos, just without the oversight, consumer protections and tax laws. So not just can they prevent the high 24-percent federal gambling levy, but sweepstakes operators aren't subject to regulatory obstacles like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming defenses.
One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in profits in 2015 alone. Now the company deals with accusations of illegal gaming in a New york city lawsuit that claims VGW uses celebrity endorsers to 'develop a veneer of authenticity' around its item. (See VGW's statement listed below)
'I'm not exactly sure" if you do not trust us, you can trust Paris Hilton" is a winning message for companies running multibillion-dollar unlawful operations out of places like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's presenter, Howard Glaser of video gaming corporation Light & Wonder, told DailyMail.com.
Sweepstakes endorsers consist of a range of celebrities from gambling lovers Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, along with NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom use any distinctions in between conventional gaming and sweepstakes play.
Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, one of lots of sweepstakes casinos discovered online
Ryan Seacrest prompts fans to dip into Chumba Casino, where lots of - but not all - games are complimentary
Drake has a deal with social sweeps gambling establishment, Stake, that he frequently touts on social networks
Find out more
Donald Trump 'set to call NBA group owner as US ambassador to Italy'
Instead, ads typically focus around the social aspect of the gambling establishments, while omitting the potential for real gaming losses.
Others lure consumers with promises of prizes. One such operator, Stake, ran a social media ad flaunting Drake's automobiles, planes and mansions before rotating to footage of the rap artist playing online casino-style video games.
'Daddy, why do we have so much cash?' read the very first caption on the screen.
Another caption discussed: 'Because I never ever quit.'
The inconsistency between gaming sites and social or sweepstakes casinos is a bit complicated, but operators of the latter insist they're not involved with the former.
A spokesperson for a market trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), explained its members are not in direct competitors with online gambling establishments and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA information, the majority of the players on social-sweepstakes casinos are sports betting free.
'Most social sweeps consumers never ever make a purchase,' the SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com. 'The minority of customers who make purchases do so in quantities far smaller than the typical deposit or wager size at real-money online gaming sites.'
Social casinos use consumers an opportunity to play casino-style games with buddies. Players have the choice to buy worthless currency frequently referred to as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged genuine cash, however can be used to unlock different functions within the video games.
But within the world of social gambling establishments exists sweepstakes gaming, allowing consumers to acquire other currency referred to as 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for cash or other prizes.
And therein lies the capacity for monetary losses, like the ones claimed by plaintiffs in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York City. One gamer informed the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes gambling establishments in the previous year after continuing to purchase more coins in pursuit of cash and other things of value.
The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting a Global Poker occasion
Social sweeps gambling establishment Stake ran an advertisement flaunting Drake's vehicles, planes and mansions
Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker
Traditional online casinos are banned in all but 7 states, which has assisted to sustain the appeal of sweepstakes gambling establishments.
Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes websites, which don't require usually require identification. However, websites like Chumba will request IDs from players attempting to withdraw any funds.
Many sites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, allow consumers to submit mail-in ask for totally free sweeps coins, supplied the players follow painfully specific directions. What's more, gamers are often rewarded with sweeps coins simply for registering, consequently providing a reason to try their hands at any number of casino video games for an opportunity to win - or lose - real money.
So why are sweepstakes websites permitted to operate in 48 states, while online gambling establishments are banned in all however 7?
According to the stakeholders, their item is the free casino-style gaming, and the real-stakes competitors is simply a means of promoting their support.
'Social sweepstakes video games are simply a type of online entertainment,' an SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com by email. 'No purchase is needed to play at social gambling establishments with sweepstakes prizes. Consumers never ever have to pay for a chance to win rewards. That lack of a purchase requirement - or" consideration" - is an important distinction between social sweeps and standard online gambling sites like casinos.'
Think about the manner in which McDonald's utilizes its annual Monopoly game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to bet, however rather they're buying hamburgers and french fries that offer them the opportunity to win profitable prizes, such as a $1 million prize.
And without a purchase requirement, or 'consideration', the video game itself doesn't fulfill the definition of gambling in the US.
'Sweepstakes are a long-standing approach for promoting all sort of daily companies in the United States, everything from burgers to magazine subscriptions to coffee and home improvement stores,' the SPGA spokesperson told DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promotions are routinely utilized by a who's who of home names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'
But to many sports betting industry insiders, that argument does not cut it.
For beginners, gaming attorney Daniel Wallach explains, McDonald's Monopoly game does not run indefinitely. Rather, it has a well-defined beginning and end, therefore recommending the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's primary item. Instead, the sweepstakes is being used to promote genuine products like french fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.
'They do not last permanently and they're generally not tied to casino-style video games of chance,' Wallach told DailyMail.com. 'They're just money free gifts.
'The sweepstakes [gambling establishments] have none of the attributes typically connected with McDonald's-design sweepstakes promotions,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in eternity, the sweepstakes casinos provide" casino-like" payouts, typically 80 percent or more of profits, whereas the normal payout percentage for a temporary advertising sweepstakes is an insignificant share of the earnings earned by the business [usually less than one percent]'
Wallach is quick to liken the online social sweeps gambling establishments to the internet coffee shops that emerged in Florida, offering clients the opportunity to play casino-style video games for genuine prizes. Much of those brick-and-mortar facilities have actually considering that been shuttered over accusations of unlawful gaming.
DJ Khaled is amongst several celebrity spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand name
Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps casinos must face comparable scrutiny.
'These distinctions are not arbitrary,' Wallach stated of social sweeps casinos. 'They have actually repeatedly been cited by courts and state lawyer generals as key aspects in identifying that a sweepstakes promo remained in reality a guise for unlawful gambling.'
Among the casino market's leading trade companies, the American Gaming Association, is now pressing lawmakers to examine sweepstakes operators and, in some cases, enact new legislation on the concern.
'Consumers are being deprived of securities and states are giving up significant tax and revenue opportunities as this gaming replaces that conducted through managed channels,' read a well-circulated AGA memo.
And then there are the plaintiffs who have taken legal action against social gambling establishments in more than a dozen states.
Sweepstakes casino operators paid a combined $14.2 million in four separate cases in Kentucky without admitting any misbehavior, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW agreed to pay $11.75 million in one class-action claim, stating the settlement was made to avoid legal costs and continued lawsuits.
Michael Phelps has signed an offer with the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker
In the current suit, which is mainly similar to its predecessors, New york city state locals Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both claim to have lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is explained in the filing as an 'illegal gaming enterprise. '
Apple and Google have likewise been called as defendants in claims for hosting the sweepstakes sites. But unlike VGW, neither tech company reacted to DailyMail.com's request for remark.
'We usually don't talk about matters before the courts,' a VGW representative informed DailyMail.com via e-mail. 'However, we keep in mind that this claim has actually only just been filed with the court and VGW has not been officially served.
'We have complete confidence in our compliance with all laws and policies where we run, and stay confident about the future,' the representative continued. 'We continue to offer our free-to-play video games across the majority of The United States and Canada, as we have for more than a years, developing not just terrific games, user experiences and home entertainment, however likewise ensuring this is done securely, properly and at the highest level of requirements.
'More broadly, we 'd restate that class actions and other litigations and arbitrations are fairly common throughout the online social video games market (and the US more broadly), and our standard practice is that we plan to strongly safeguard any claim which might be brought against us.'
The issues in between conventional online gaming and sweepstakes gambling establishments could prove troublesome for some celeb endorsers.
Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both endorse VGW's Global Poker brand name while the NBA is partnered with traditional video gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.
'It's ironic that expert athletes are hawking illegal sports betting 'sweeps' websites while at the same time the leagues wish to forecast a strong stance versus unlawful gambling - specifically when trying to tamp down the occasional sports betting scandal,' Glaser informed DailyMail.com.
It was simply eight months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter got a life time restriction from the NBA over claims he conspired with gamblers. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unrelated to anything involving social or sweepstakes gambling establishments.
In addition to VGW, Apple and Google are being sued for hosting allegedly unlawful sports betting sites
Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes casinos as a significant concern for leagues such as the NBA.
'I 'd anticipate that a league crackdown on athletes endorsing sweepstakes sites is a matter of when, not if,' Glaser added.
Neither an NBA spokesman nor the gamers' agents reacted to DailyMail.com's demands for remark. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps likewise ignored to react to DailyMail.com e-mails.
Asked if their star endorsers have a duty to describe to consumers the distinctions and resemblances between iGaming and sweepstakes gambling establishments, VGW insisted there is absolutely nothing more that needs to be done.
'We have full confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial partnerships, and our business practices more broadly,' the spokesperson stated. 'A few of our values are" our gamers come first" and" we do what's right", and we put our values at the core of everything we do.'
Glaser, an outspoken challenger of sweepstakes websites, sees things differently.
'Celebrities who lend their names to shady prohibited sports betting sites are, at a minimum, putting their credibilities at risk in addition to courting civil and class actions by customers who allege harm,' Glaser stated. 'There is also some danger that state regulators and state chief law officers rope star endorsers into enforcement efforts for facilitating illegal gaming.'
New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton
